Agreed on both counts; I actually wrote an essay recently which touched briefly on this.I have always thought of fairy tales as a form of mythology, and I think that fairy tales remain my favorite form of mythology.
Easily, "The King who was a Gentleman." It seems there was a King who fancied himself a gentleman, since he would never call anyone a liar, no matter what they said. The King proposed a contest to marry off his daughter and find the next king.* see if anyone could compel him to declare the suitor a liar—the punishment for failure is, of course, a beheading.—would you expect any less of a folktale king? Jack, or Boots finally gets the king to tell him he is a liar after, on his third and final attempt, tells how he fell from a great beanstalk, lodged himself in the earth so he couldn't move, and was forced to cut off his head with his knife. The head runs off to seek help, but is intercepted by a fox. Sensing his head is in danger, Jack jumps out of the ground and kicks out of the fox seven more kings who were more gentlemanly than the king whose daughter he was seeking. That one always made me laugh.Got a favorite fairy tale?
Hi Legend f Joe.Yeah, fairy tales like that can be grating!
And in a variant,In one of my favorites, the title character sez:
Today I brew, tomorrow I bake;
And then the Prince child I will take;
For no one knows my little game
That Rumplestiltskin is my name!
Tom Tit-Tot?!?And in a variant,
"Nimmy, nimmy not,
My name's Tom Tit-Tot."
There is a book by Propp called Morphology of the Folktale.Hi Legend f Joe.
I also noticed that in some stories the same thing happens seven times before its possible to move forward with the plot. that wasn't very exciting. you'd think that it would drum the story into the childs memory. let me see. i recollect a king who doesn't want to have his daughter marry and makes a contest where anyone who looses looses his head - of course - and its the seventh applicant who wins through. ok so it sort of worked.
Yep, English variant!Tom Tit-Tot?!?
A nimmy nimmy thank you. You're a kind lad. (English variant, you say? 'Cause I got a Southern accent stuck in me head.)Yep, English variant!
"A-why," says he, "I was out a huntin' to-day, an' I got away to a place in the wood I'd never seen afore. An' there was an old chalk-pit. An' I heard a sort of hummin', kind o'. So I got off my hobby, an' I went right quiet to the pit, an' I looked down. Well, what should there be but the funniest little black thing you ever set eyes on. An' what was that a-doing on, but that had a little spinnin'-wheel, an' that were a-spinnin' wonderful fast, an' a-twirlin' that's tail. An' as that span. that sang:
'Nimmy Nimmy Not
My name's TOM TIT TOT.'"
Copied from Fairy Gold by Ernest Rhys.
Hi Legend of Joe,There is a book by Propp called Morphology of the Folktale.
I did not read it, but from what i know he examines the repetitive formulas that are found in folktales.
The number of times someone does something is significant. It can be tedious for a modern reader however.
In the collection of stories from the Navajo, The Dine' Bahane, many events have to be repeated four times in order for it to stick.
I suppose 4 is sacred (4 seasons, four directions, etc.), but I could be wrong.
It sounds like Propp may be a structuralist. I haven't thought about structuralism in ages, but it is a fascinating subject (especially for a mathematician like me). I need to check on that book.There is a book by Propp called Morphology of the Folktale.
I did not read it, but from what i know he examines the repetitive formulas that are found in folktales.
The number of times someone does something is significant. It can be tedious for a modern reader however.
In the collection of stories from the Navajo, The Dine' Bahane, many events have to be repeated four times in order for it to stick.
I suppose 4 is sacred (4 seasons, four directions, etc.), but I could be wrong.
Hi fibi ducksHi Legend of Joe,
I hope you are well.
This about the Navajo, a friend of mine was interested in their lore and told me that they are the only people who have the number 4 be a big part of their stories. everyone else is into 3's i think he said. he didn't have any account of why this is. just that it is a mystery.
Do you mean structuralist ala Levi-Strauss?It sounds like Propp may be a structuralist. I haven't thought about structuralism in ages, but it is a fascinating subject (especially for a mathematician like me). I need to check on that book.
i feel a bit put out, like the Sioux just did it to show i was wrong about the Navajo."The number 4 is central in the world view of the Sioux, with four groups of gods (superior, ally, subordinate, and spirit), four types of animal (creeping, flying, four-legged, and two-legged), and four ages of humans (infant, child, mature, and elderly). Their medicine men instructed them to carry out all activities in groups of four."